Comments on: Spurgeon’s First Words at the Tabernacle

By: Dominic Stockford

Dominic Stockford — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 08:55:39 +0000

I’m not sure that the doughnut that RW would offer CHS would do him much good.

But then CHS would offer RW the truth about Jesus Christ, which can only do good.

By: Michael Bingham

Michael Bingham — Fri, 21 Jan 2011 03:12:56 +0000

We would see Jesus (only). Not as the World see’s him, but as He is, begotton of the Father full of Grace and truth. He who knew the company of Angels condesended to walk along with Men with dust on His sacred feet. He who became poor that we might become rich. Who in himself took upon Himself the sins of all who would truly believe.

Some say he was a Prophet or a great Man, but we see Him who framed the Worlds by the cordant music of his voice. Yes, vieled in flesh the Godheas see, Hail the incarnate Deity. May his Name be ever exalted in the midst of the Congregation!

By: me

me — Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:30:13 +0000

That Spurgeon, Always giving the Sunday school answer.

By: Scott Webber

Scott Webber — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:16:59 +0000

What bothers me most is not Rick Warren. It’s how many pastors and lay people have opted speak on so many other (church?) issues and have either put Jesus Christ on the back burner or have taken up the cause of a different Jesus and a different gospel.

By: Bobby

Bobby — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 17:15:49 +0000

I had the privilege of being in London once and attending a worship service at the Metropolitan Tabernacle. To my delight, the service was all about Spurgeon’s Christ. Dr. Peter Masters never mentioned CHS in his sermon, and there was nothing in the building that I saw with Spurgeon’s name on it. Mr. Surrgeon would not have had it any other way.

By: Angus

Angus — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:26:58 +0000

Okay, okay. When did this become about Warren? Or Spurgeon for that matter? Read Spurgeon’s first and last words (in the next post) at the Tabernacle to see on Whom we should be focusing: Jesus Christ! Amen?

By: LuLu

LuLu — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:24:34 +0000

What kind of a man denies the statements his own mouth makes,even when those statements are recorded? What sort of “Pastor” agrees to compromise with sinful,and apostate systems,and openly embraces some,for the sake of promoting his”Hubris-Driven”agenda? Who would be blaphemous enough to prostitute a baptism service as an opportunity to get a picture taken with him and parellel the experience of his ministry anniversary to Penecost?…Should we even mention this lunatics name in the same sentence as Spurgeon,a fire-trialed man of God?